Study Shows Doctor Care Varies By Compensation Method
|
Troy Quast |
Health care is a hot topic these days among political candidates,
and the economics of health care is an important part of that
debate.
Inequities, waste, rising costs, and eroding trust by patients
are among often-cited shortcomings in the present health care
process.
Troy Quast, assistant professor of economics at Sam Houston
State University, says that his research shows that the way
in which doctors are paid may influence the level of care
received by their patients.
Quast and two other researchers compared the two ways Medicaid
managed care organizations pay their doctors--fee for service
and fixed, or "capitation," in which doctors are
paid a flat fee per month. They looked at care provided to
children and to asthma patients.
In the case of well-child services, doctors in managed-care
organizations that used fee-for-service arrangements exclusively
provided more health care services than doctors in managed
care organizations that also used fixed fee arrangements.
In the case of Medicaid asthma patients, the state pays for
asthma medications, which can reduce a primary care physician's
costs by limiting the need for future office visits to deal
with asthma complications.
"By a small margin, patients in managed care organizations
that paid some doctors via capitation were more likely to
receive appropriate medication," Quast said. "So
fee for service seemed to work better than capitation in well-child
care, but not in asthma care."
Quast did the research while completing his doctoral dissertation
at the University of Florida in 2006. He studied eight managed
care organizations in a large state that he could not identify
because of research confidentiality agreements.
His findings were noted in an article published in the October
2007 issue of Managed Care Magazine. An article he wrote along
with David Sappington and Elizabeth Shenkman has also been
accepted for publication at some unannounced date by the journal
Health Economics.
"There's a push by policymakers to move Medicaid enrollees
to join managed care," he said in the Managed Care Magazine
article, "but it's important that policy makers are sure
MCOs benefit the patient."
While various medical care policies and plans are being discussed
by presidential candidates, Quast says that incentives should
be taken into consideration.
"If we want to get the results we're hoping for, we have
to be sure that doctors and hospitals have the right incentives,"
he said.
Quast has taught in the Department of Economics and International
Business at Sam Houston State University since the fall of
2006.
—END—
SHSU Media Contact: Frank
Krystyniak
Jan. 31, 2008
Please send comments, corrections, news tips to Today@Sam.edu.
|